Legal Opinion

C. C. Clark, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1942No. 9928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

The question .presented for decision is whether appellant was entitled, in the computation of its surtax liability on its undistributed profits for the years 1936 and 1937, to credits as provided by Section 26 of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev. Acts, page 835, for payments made upon certain promissory notes outstanding against it that became due in those years. The credits were not claimed in the taxpayer’s returns for those years, and this suit was brought to recover the excess of the taxes alleged to have been erroneously paid by reason thereof. Judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Moloney Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Lamm Lumber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  3. Union Telephone Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. C. C. Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Helvering v. Magnus Beck Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Commissioner v. Dulup Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. American Liberty Pipe Line Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. Commissioner v. Saginaw & Manistee Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API