Legal Opinion

Troutman v. Bock

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1941No. File No. 8373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P.J.

A judgment was entered specifically enforcing a contract to will property to plaintiff. Thereafter an order was made setting the judgment aside and granting a- new trial. The appeal is from that order.

Our review of the record is undertaken in the light of the fact that the motion for new trial was heard by one who did not preside at the trial, and that therefore the judge who heard the motion was not vested with a discretion in the premises. Sands v. Cruikshank et al., 15 S. D. 142, 87 N. W. 589; Tyler et al. v. Haggart, 19 S. D. 167, 102 N. W. 682; Lavin v. Kreger, 20 S. D. 80, 104 N. W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canada v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Beveridge v. BaileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Steensland v. NoelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Tyler v. HaggartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Sands v. CruikshankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. MelbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Crawford v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API