Legal Opinion

Clark v. Allen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1947No. 626Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

331 U.S. 503 (1947)

CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN,

v.

ALLEN ET AL.

No. 626.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 11, 1947.

Decided June 9, 1947.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Harry LeRoy Jones argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, M.S. Isenbergh, David Schwartz and Armand B. DuBois.

S.C. Masterson argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Joseph Wahrhaftig.

By special leave of Court, Everett W. Mattoon, Deputy…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Douglas; Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API