Cunha v. City of New Bedford
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, CJ.
The plaintiff, an attorney, seeks to use the bottom floor of one of his three homes as a professional office. Further, he wishes to allow other attorneys in his employ occasionally to use the home office for the legal work of the plaintiff. A judge of the Land Court, after trial, held that the plaintiff was permitted to use the residence as a professional office and in doing so could employ as many “support staff” as reasonably necessary. However, the judge ruled also that other attorneys employed by the plaintiff could not use the home office. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Town of Harvard v. MaxantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Henry v. Board of Appeals of DunstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- DeShazo v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Old Colony Council - Boy Scouts of America v. Zoning Board of Appeals of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garabedian v. WestlandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Burnham v. Town of HadleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Simmons v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Garabedian v. WestlandMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000