Legal Opinion

Fleming v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by petitioner, an adult (who describes herself herein as plaintiff), for leave to file a notice of claim nunc pro tunc. The notice was served but one day after the 90-day period. This application was made three and one-half months after the rejection of the notice of claim by the municipal authorities.

The court “may grant leave ” for late service where “ the claimant is an infant, or is mentally or physically incapacitated ” and “by reason of such disability” fails to serve the notice on time (General Municipal Law, § 50-e). The movant’s basic contention — that she was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. McEwan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Claim of McEwan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. De Stefano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Babinsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of JacobsNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API