Legal Opinion
MacKown v. Illinois Publishing & Printing Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 15, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,168PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by her as a result of using a preparation recommended in an article written by one of its agents and printed in defendant’s newspaper, to eradicate “Dandruff Woes” with which she was troubled. Her amended statement of claim was stricken on motion of defendant on the ground that it did not state a cause of action. The suit was dismissed and plaintiff appeals.
The allegations of the amended complaint in substance are that defendant publishes and circulates a newspaper and its issue of May 9, 1936, contained an article…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- B. Shoninger Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- McAndrews v. Chicago, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Jaillet v. . CashmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- De Bardeleben Marine Corp., as Successor in Interest to Blue Stack Towing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Yuhas v. MudgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Cardozo v. TrueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.