Ward v. . Ward

But the Court, ASHE, J., and WILLIAMS, J., stopped the Attorney-General, saying they differed with him in opinion, with respect to the operation of the statute of uses; but they were clearly of opinion without hearingHaywood further, that here the fee immediately passed to the grantee, and the reservation was void.

NOTE. — See the cases of Sasser v. Blyth, 2 N.C. 259, and Smithv. Grady, 13 N.C. 395, which seem to overrule this case.

Cited: Savage v. Lee, 90 N.C. 323.(60)