Legal Opinion

Mosby v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 12, 1985No. 13-84-189-CRPublished

1Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

SEERDEN, Justice.

The State filed a motion for leave to file a late motion for rehearing. Pursuant to Rules 4 and 6, TEX.R.CRIM.APP.P., we granted the State’s motion to file a motion for rehearing. Cf. Marroquin v. State, 652 S.W.2d 429, 434 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1983, no pet.).

In its motion for rehearing, the State argues that an amendment to TEX.REV. CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 5561h is relevant to this case and provides a pertinent exception to the psychiatrist/patient privilege. The State urges, therefore, the communications between appellant and Dr. Nelson were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AbellTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ex Parte WatsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Exxon Corporation v. BrecheenTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Ritchey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API