Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1992No. 10A04-9101-CR-4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Thirty-two year old Robert Ragland Smith had the misfortune of participating in the sale of a mixture of aspirin and flour, which was represented as cocaine, to an undercover police officer. He was convicted by a jury of Dealing in a Substance Represented to be a Controlled Substance, a Class D felony. 1 Smith was also found to be an habitual offender. He was sentenced to a term of eighteen months on the dealing charge and an additional twenty years on the habitual offender finding.

ISSUES

I. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction of Dealing in a Substance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Birkla v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dahlberg v. OgleIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court, Room ThreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Pryor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. South Bend Tribune v. Elkhart Circuit CourtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Rita v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Gregory S. Powers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Marion County Department of Public Welfare v. BeardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Rita v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API