Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Everett District Council of Lumber & Sawmill Workers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1941No. 28348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

This court, in common with nearly all the courts of this country, including particularly the United States supreme court, has in recent years held that "peaceful picketing" as such is lawful and may not be enjoined. But what is "peaceful picketing"? The meaning of that term or, more properly, the scope of permissible activity included therein, is the rock upon which the claims of individuals, and the pronouncements of judges as well, have split.

If all men were agreed, or accepted the principle, that "peaceful picketing" is simply a method of human communication through which an individual, or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Everett District Council of Lumber & Sawmill WorkersWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API