Legal Opinion
Barnsback v. T. H. Mastin & Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 10, 1924Published
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs
Defendant in error brought an action in assumpsit in the circuit court of Madison county against plaintiff in error and one Charles H. Hanger. The declaration contains the common counts only. Process was issued and was served on Charles H. Hanger personally and the sheriff’s return as to service on plaintiff in error is as follows:
“I have duly served the within writ upon T. H. Mastín & Co. and by delivering a true copy hereof to Robert S. Davis, agent for said company, the president, secretary or treasurer of said T. H. Mastín & Co. not found in my county, as I am therein commanded, this the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goddard v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Independent Order of Mutual Aid v. PaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Fitzpatrick v. RutterIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- United States Express Co. v. BedburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Bon Aqua Imp't Co. v. Standard Fire Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.