Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 1921No. A-3632PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.

(after stating the facts as above). It is a deplorable thing that a human life should be taken for no other apparent reason than the possession of an old flour sack to be carried on a hunting trip. The evidence discloses that defendant leit home on the occasion of this hunting trip before deceased left the same premises. If defendant was so greatly concerned as to who should carry his hunting sack, it seems reasonable to believe he would have taken it himself. Again, it is unreasonable to believe that deceased would make a deadly assault upon defendant merely because defendant had asked him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. State v. FooteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  3. Bishop v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Crum v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Lefcourt v. StreitSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API