Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murray v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1980Published

1Dissent

Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ.,

dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum by Staley, Jr., J. Staley, Jr., J. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent and vote to affirm. At the time of the alleged contacts with Judge Friedlander, defendant was seeking support for her child from her first husband, and, therefore, there could be no identity of legal actions. Section 14 of the Judiciary Law provides, in part, that: "A judge shall not sit as such in, or take part in the decision of, an action, claim, matter, motion or proceeding * * * in which he has been attorney or counsel”. The statute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . PatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Corradino v. CorradinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Keeffe v. Third National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. In re Robin ONew York City Family Court · 1974
  5. In re the Children's Aid Society for the Guardianship of NatterNew York Family Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API