Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Malta Park

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2014No. 2014-CA-0478PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge.

| ,This appeal involves a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. (“IIED”) by a non-client, Judith Sullivan, against her adversary’s lead attorney, F Evans Schmidt.1 From the trial court’s* judgment granting Mr. Schmidt’s peremptory exception of no cause of action, Ms. Sullivan appeals.2 The narrow issue presented is whether, in the context of a discovery deposition, a defense attorney, posing offensive questions to a seventy-year-old, medically impaired plaintiff who was living in an assisted living facility and alleged to be terminally ill, constitutes…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Penalber v. BlountSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Industrial Companies, Inc. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. Montalvo v. SondesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Malta ParkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Dabezies v. TreloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. A.F. by and through her parents, R.F. and A.F. v. Assumption Parish School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  4. Couvillion Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Gwendolyn M. Hanhart v. Louisiana Cvs Pharmacy LLC; Cvs Pharmacy Inc.; Cvs Health Solutions LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API