Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hennigan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 23, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

After a mistrial was declared at the request of both defendants on the second day of trial, the defendants were retried and convicted of assault and battery on indictments charging rape. In addition the defendant Hennigan was convicted on a separate indictment charging assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and Gosselin was convicted on a separate indictment charging assault and battery. 1. Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the record does not show any “judicial overreaching or bad faith” which would bar reprosecution after the mistrial was granted at the defendants’ request.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. DominicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. StracuzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API