Cook v. State

1. The conviction in this case being sustained by the evidence and approved by the trial judge, this coprt can not set aside the verdict upon the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

2. Grounds 1, 2, and 3 of the amendment to the motion for new trial will not be considered, for the reason that each of them fails to state the name of the witness whose testimony was admitted over counsel’s objection. Crawford v. State, 33 Ga. App. 612 (127 S. E. 415), and cit.; Wilkie v. State, 159 Ga. 559 (126 S. E. 383).

*583Decided March 8, 1927. Duke Davis, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors,…