Bruch v. Bruch

Reno, J.,

In response to a rule procured by respondent after the return-day, but before filing an answer, libellant filed a bill of particulars, in the first two paragraphs of which he specified two distinct acts of adultery by mentioning precisely date, place and particeps criminis. In the third paragraph he alleged “that at other times and places between said dates of Sept. 23, 1921, and January, 1921, the respondent committed adultery” with a person named, and avers that he cannot now state the exact time and places with greater particularity. Respondent demands a more specific bill,…