Legal Opinion
Attwood v. Purcell
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 8, 1975No. Civ. No. 75-17 Phx. WPCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
COPPLE, District Judge:
This action was brought pursuant to jurisdiction vested in this court by 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), (4) and 28 U.S.C. § 2284(3). A three-judge court was convened in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2284(1).
Plaintiffs have been and wish to continue to be performing “topless" dancers whose services are engaged by adult film theaters to provide live entertainment between films. The dancers perform upon a stage and do not mingle with the audience. These theaters limit their clientele to paying adults and minors are excluded. The theaters do not…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Attwood v. PurcellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1975