Legal Opinion
Lush v. TERRI AND RUTH F/V, IN REM.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 4, 2004No. CIV.03-156-P-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HORNBY, District Judge.
In this case, the plaintiffs, two individuals, seek to enforce an oral purchase agreement for a fishing vessel. The defendants are the vessel and its corporate owner. 1 Most of the summary judgment facts are set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Item 49). The record, however, has expanded since the Magistrate Judge issued his recommended decision on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 2 Based upon my de…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Stanton v. University of Maine SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Gowen, Inc. v. F/V Quality OneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Jordan-Milton MacHinery, Inc. v. F/V Teresa Marie, IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- IKOSSI, MD v. ST MARY'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025
- Morin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2006