Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. N. Barsky & Sons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1978No. 44PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant N. Barsky & Sons [Barsky] is disputing a Sales and Use Tax assessment made by the Commonwealth. This *16liability is covered by a lien of $579,000 filed against appellant by the Commonwealth pursuant to the Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March 4, 1971, P.L. 45, § 277, 72 P.S. § 7277 (Supp.1977). Barsky appealed the administrative determination imposing the assessment to the Commonwealth Court under 72 P.S. § 7255. The Commonwealth Court ordered appellant to file an additional $200,000 bond as a condition of prosecuting the appeal, relying upon the Fiscal Code,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimmel v. Somerset County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Eagles, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyle Land & Fuel Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. PPM Atlantic Renewable v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Ernest Renda Contracting Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. N. Barsky & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Escofil v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API