In re Bostic

OPINION OF THE COURT

In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with three allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained all charges based upon the respondent’s failure to interpose an answer to the petition or to appear at the scheduled hearing before the Special Referee.

Charge One alleged that the respondent had failed to comply with the lawful demands of the Grievance Committee in connection with its investigation into allegations of professional misconduct. By letter dated September 29, 1993, the respondent was advised that the Grievance Committee had received a…