Legal Opinion

United States v. Usher

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1974No. 73-4022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to this court’s remand under United States v. Dover, 489 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1974), the district judge who sentenced the defendant has supplemented the record in this cause with the statement “At the time I pronounced sentence in this case I determined and I now determine that the Defendant would not derive benefit from treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b) (The Youth Correction Act).” This statement complies with the district court’s duty under that act. Dorszynski v. United States, -U.S.-, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d -(1974).

Since Usher has never raised with the district court any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. DoverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roger Lee Brager v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Johnnie Tasby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Harman Victor Usher, No. 73-4022 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of N.Y. 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API