Legal Opinion

Doten v. Hair

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1860Published

1Opinion of the CourtBigelow, C. J.

A consideration of the relative rights of the parties now contesting this suit under the mortgages held by them respectively will lead to a ready solution of the question in controversy between them. The defendant is the first mortgagee, and is in actual possession and occupation of the premises under a formal entry to foreclose. He is also the owner of the right to redeem the whole estate by virtue of a deed from the original mortgagor. The plaintiff is the second mortgagee, and he brings this action for the purpose of foreclosure, and of cutting off this right of the defendant to redeem the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Penniman v. HollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. Walcutt v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API