Legal Opinion

State v. Salmon

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1980No. 16591, 16723PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendants appeal their convictions of burglary 1 on the theory of entrapment.

Although certain facts are disputed by the defendants, the following believable evidence was adduced at trial. Prior to the events in question, defendants resided in the State of California. They communicated with a friend, one John Buey, about coming to Utah. Buey lived with his brother-in-law, Jamie Flowers, in Salt Lake County. Flowers testified that Buey told him that defendants were coming to Utah for the purpose of robbing some Utah drugstores. On April 10,1979, Flowers notified one James…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. KelbachUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. KelbachUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. RammelUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ColwellUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. KourbelasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. CrippsUtah Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API