Legal Opinion

Ryder System, Inc. v. O'Connor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 1979No. 77-2326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

This cause is affirmed.

We have given careful consideration to Judge Stettin’s well reasoned dissent, but cannot agree with his conclusion.

The point he believes to be controlling was not raised on appeal. Notwithstanding we would adopt the dissent, but for the existing counterclaim. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(2) clearly mandates that a voluntary dismissal cannot be taken save by leave of court, when a counterclaim has been filed. This vital distinction was fully appreciated by all parties to this cause when one considers the following language from a Motion for a Continuance filed by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siler v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Citrus Machinery Co. v. Six L's Packing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API