Ryder System, Inc. v. O'Connor
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
This cause is affirmed.
We have given careful consideration to Judge Stettin’s well reasoned dissent, but cannot agree with his conclusion.
The point he believes to be controlling was not raised on appeal. Notwithstanding we would adopt the dissent, but for the existing counterclaim. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(2) clearly mandates that a voluntary dismissal cannot be taken save by leave of court, when a counterclaim has been filed. This vital distinction was fully appreciated by all parties to this cause when one considers the following language from a Motion for a Continuance filed by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Siler v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Citrus Machinery Co. v. Six L's Packing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984