Legal Opinion
State v. David
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 2000No. WD 57162PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, Jr., Judge.
The state, under § 547.200.1(3) Supp. 1998, appeals a trial court ruling suppressing evidence in a prosecution for possession of methamphetamine. The state contends the search was a lawful investigatory search incident to a lawful stop for identification purposes. We affirm the trial court ruling suppressing the evidence.
Factual Background
Law enforcement authorities of Buchanan County had received reliable information that Stanley Smith of Maitland, Missouri, was involved in the manufacture of methamphetamine. Officers had obtained a search warrant they intended to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. EnglandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. NeelMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. GarriottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- EDDIE WAYNE SMITH, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.