Legal Opinion

Ricards, Leftwich & Co. v. Royal Insurance

Baltimore City Superior Court

Decided March 6, 1900Published

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKBRIDGE, J.—

The prayers offered in this case present a numhe^ of interesting questions in the law of insurance, some of which are not entirely free from difficulty.

The plaintiffs were the owners of thirty-six hogsheads of tobacco, which had been purchased by them at points in North Carolina, and was in transit for Kobe, Japan, and while in the course of such transit the goods were destroyed by fire upon the dock of the Baltimore Steam Packet Company, on the 17th of May, 1898. At the time of the loss the plaintiffs had a policy in the Royal Insurance Company of Liverpool upon tobacco which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Insurance v. Alexander Brown & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  2. Whiting ex rel. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Independent Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. Fitzsimmons v. City Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Alliance Marine Assurance Co. v. Louisiana State InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1835
  5. Commonwealth Insurance v. CropperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API