Bram v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.
It is not necessary in our view of the record to refer in detail to more than one.of the contentions of the defendant in this proceeding. It appears from the bill of exceptions that the trial court in its'general charge to the jury said that the defendant if the evidence justified, might be found guilty as an aider and abettor. This instruction was repeatedly made to the jury in the general charge.
It is apparent, we think, from the evidence in the record that if the fire was incendiary the defendant alone promoted it. There is not a scintilla of evidence to connect any other person or persons…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Roth v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Gross & Weissfeld v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1933