Legal Opinion

Orr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1997No. 97-445PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s ruling that the filing of the appellant’s latest Rule 3.850 motion constitutes an abuse of process. Because his appeals are dissipating limited judicial resources, and we expect they will continue, the appellant, Jeff Orr, is prohibited from filing with this court any further pro se pleadings concerning his convictions and sentences. Accordingly, absent any further order by this court, any further pleadings regarding these convictions and sentences will be summarily rejected and returned by the clerk of this court, unless that pleading is filed by a member in good…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Pinkney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API