Conely v. Common Council
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Delators applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate proceedings appointing election inspectors. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
Until recently the city of Detroit was divided into 63 election districts. Under an act to amend the charter (Act No. 564, Local Acts of 1887), five inspectors of election for each of said 63 districts had been elected. Decently the common council has redistricted the city, creating 102 election districts. Some of the former districts remain unchanged. On October 4, 1892, the com*447mon council, by resolution, appointed five inspectors of election for each of tbe 102 districts. In the districts which had been undisturbed by the resubdivision, the inspectors who had been elected under the act of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Andrews v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Dingwall v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moreland v. MillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Baxter v. LatimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Toy, Ex Rel. Elliott v. VoelkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- State ex rel. Cook v. BirdsallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Toy, Ex Rel. Elliott v. VoelkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.