Legal Opinion

Maxfield Wilton & Associates, Inc. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1937No. Civ. 11207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The petitioner, an employer, seeks to have annulled an award made by respondent Industrial Accident Commission and to have liability imposed upon respondent Colonial Mutual Compensation Insurance Company, Ltd.

The petitioner was engaged in the business of building maintenance and employed a number of workmen. One John F. Willis was employed by petitioner to do painting on an apartment house and suffered injuries which occurred in the course of and arose out of his employment. He filed an application with respondent commission to obtain an award against petitioner and respondent insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Maryland C. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Whipple v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  2. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Negvesky v. AlstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Paulson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Arrowhead Highlands Mutual Service Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API