Walker v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for vagrancy under Code Section 22-3302(1 ).1 Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and that he had a lawful means of support realized from a lawful occupation or source.
The facts are as follows. About midnight on May 10, 1963, a police officer observed appellant sitting on a bench in Lafayette Park. At appellant’s request the officer sat next to him. After conversing for several moments, appellant asked the officer if he would like to earn some money “rolling queers.” Appellant explained that he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rogers v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Burns v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Stephens v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ricks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- State Ex Rel. De Concini v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969