State v. Brown

Defendant appeals her conviction for violating ordinance No. 25.75.020 of the city of Omaha. We affirm.

Ordinance No. 25.75.020 is set out in plaintiffs brief as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person purposely or knowingly to engage or agree to engage in an act of prostitution.” Defendant argues only the sufficiency of the evidence and the vagueness of the ordinance.

The evidence adduced was sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty. The arresting officer was the chief witness for the State. The issue is clearly one of credibility. While this is an ordinance violation tried without a…