Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hodges v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1982No. 82-CA-0043Published

1DissentSavoie, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

It is well settled in Louisiana that each case involving a train-vehicle collision should be tried on its own facts and circumstances. Also, the party’s negligence is a matter of factual determination to be followed by application of proper law. Odom v. Hooper, 273 So.2d 510 (La.1973); Buchholz v. Dealers Transport Company, 399 So.2d 1303 (La.App. 4th Cir.1981). It is equally well settled that factual determinations by the trial court are not to be disturbed in the absence of clear (manifest) error. Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978); West v. Jones, 411…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Odom v. HooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Rahm v. Exxon Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. West v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Buchholz v. Dealers Transport Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API