Stern v. Rosenthal
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Adolf Stern against Samuel Rosenthal and others. From a judgment of the New York City Court in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for new trial, they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
The plaintiff claims that he entered into an oral agreement with the defendants under which the defendants hired the plaintiff for an indefinite term to make up into trousers material supplied by defendants, and that, in consideration of the payment by the plaintiff of $1 to be deducted by defendants from every $100 worth of work done upon defendants’ material by plaintiff, the defendants agreed to pay plaintiff the value of the labor put upon said material if the same should be damaged or destroyed by fire. The plaintiff also claims that, pursuant to said agreement, he received materials…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- French v. . VixNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hensel v. Provident Bicycle Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- French v. VixNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Woodward v. . RosendaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- State v. TowleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946