Legal Opinion · Dissent

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of New York

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1985No. 84-1176Published

1Dissent

Justice White, with whom Justice Blackmun joins,

dissenting.

The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-617, 92 Stat. 3117 (PURPA), is part of a broad congressional *1076response to the energy crisis. One of its provisions, § 210 of Title II, 16 U. S. C. § 824a-3, is designed to promote the development of alternative energy resources by overcoming the historical reluctance of electric utilities to purchase power from nontraditional facilities. FERC v. Mississippi, 456 U. S. 742, 750 (1982). Section 210(a) authorizes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to promulgate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API