Legal Opinion

Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd. v. Dorchester Master Ltd. Partnership

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 7, 1996No. 83565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Appellants, Dorchester Master Limited Partnership (“DMLP”), Parker & Parsley Gas Processing Co. and Parker & Parsley Development Co. (collectively “P & P”), and Midland Gas Processing Co. (“Midland”), seek review of the trial court’s order which granted a permanent injunction to Appellee Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd. (“Dorchester”). Dorchester sought a permanent injunction against DMLP, Midland and Parker and Parsley Gas Processing Company (collectively “Appellants”), to enjoin those entities from interfering with Dorchester’s assumption of possession, operation and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barton v. WarrenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API