Legal Opinion

Einzig v. Board of Police Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1934No. Civ. No. 9555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

The sole question involved in this proceeding is: Did respondent board act in excess of its jurisdiction in revoking permits theretofore issued to petitioners authorizing them to conduct the game called “Tango” or “Skill Ball”? The authority of the board to revoke permits issued under the ordinance authorizing them is not questioned, “if said board becomes satisfied that the conduct of such games does not or will not comport with the public welfare for any reason, or that the same has been conducted in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner . . . [or] where the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Ex parte ShobertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. RandallOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finster v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Bell Gardens Bicycle Club v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API