Legal Opinion

Petsinger v. Office of Vocational Rehabilitation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

John W. Petsinger petitions for review of a February 5, 1996 final decision of the Executive Director of the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation (OVR) denying his appeal of the alleged denial of vocational rehabilitation services by OVR. We affirm.

OVR was established by the Vocational Rehabilitation Act (the Act), Act of December 20, 1988, P.L. 1306, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 682.1-682.18, as the Pennsylvania agency designated to administer the state plan for vocational rehabilitation services under federal law, 29 U.S.C. §§ 720-751. OVR is charged with providing vocational rehabilitation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Manley v. Office of Vocational RehabilitationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brinckerhoff v. Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  2. Petsinger v. Department of Labor & Industry, Office of Vocational RehabilitationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API