Kammann v. Chris Bimmerle Painting Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Wm. M. Kinsey, Judge. The motion in the case was not preserved in a bill of exceptions, and unless such motion is preserved in a bill of exceptions there is nothing for the appellate court to review. Force v. Patten, 149 Mo. 448; Railroad, v. Carlisle, 94 Mo. 166; State v. Gee, 79 Mo. 313; Esty v. Post, 76 Mo. 411; Corby v. Tracy, 62 Mo. 511; Brown v.Foote, 55 Mo. 178; London v. King, 22 Mo. 336; Tarkio v. Clark, 186 Mo. 293.
1Opinion of the CourtNixon, P. J.
This is an appeal from the action of the St. Louis City Circuit Court in overruling the motion of a garnishee to quash an execution which had been issued against it by the clerk of said court in a cause' therein pending wherein appellant (here) was plaintiff and one Robert Gass was defendant.
The printed abstract furnished contains (1) the motion to quash, (2) the transcript of the judgment on which the execution was issued (which appellant states it offered in evidence below to support the motion to quash), (3) a recital that the motion to quash was overruled on the 15th day of June, 1908,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christy's Administrator v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
- Corby v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- McNeil v. Home InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Force v. Van PattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Horton v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.