Legal Opinion

Carlow v. Blenman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1995No. Nos. 93-04074, 94-00326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, pro se plaintiff in a personal injury suit, challenges the trial court’s order dismissing her suit upon her failure to obtain representation. She argues that she be allowed to represent herself. Under the facts of this case, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ordering her to obtain counsel. See Rodriguez-Diaz v. Abate, 613 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We conclude, however, that the trial court abused its discretion *480in allowing her less than two weeks to find representation. Accordingly, we vacate the order of dismissal and remand for the entry of a modified order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kline v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Brodose v. School Bd. of Pinellas CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Rodriguez-Diaz v. AbateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paoli v. NATHERSON & CO., PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Howell v. Pasco CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API