Legal Opinion

Hay v. Butts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1957No. 36579PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. “All pleadings must receive a construction in accordance with the natural intendment of the words and language used, and, as a general rule, must be construed most strongly against the pleader (Athens Mfg. Co. v. Rucker, 80 Ga. 291, 4 S. E. 885); but, if a petition be subject to two constructions, and there be no demurrer thereto . . . then, in determining whether the case has been proved as laid, that construction will be adopted which is most favorable to the assertion of a cause of action in the plaintiff’s favor. Payton v. Gulf Line Ry. Co., 4 Ga. App. 762 (62 S. E. 469).” Bell v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Athens Manufacturing Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Bell v. State Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Payton v. Gulf Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Fortner v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New Cigar Co. v. THE BROKEN SPUR, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API