Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS, REJECTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
On August 16, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a “Report and Recommendation” (“R & R”) on a motion for attorney fees filed by Defendants Continental Automotive Systems U.S., Inc., TRW Automotive U.S., L.L.C., and TK Holdings, Inc. 1 Defendants filed their objections to the R & R on August 30, 2010. Plaintiff responded on September 13, 2010, and Defendants filed a reply on September 20, 2010. For the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.