Legal Opinion · Dissent

Svensen v. Svensen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1981No. 20753Published

1DissentGuittard, Chief Justice

I cannot agree that dismissal of a prematurely filed divorce suit is reversible error, or that such a suit must be reinstated when the residence requirement has been met. I conclude rather that in the absence of extraordinary circumstances the trial court has a measure of discretion which, in this case, has not been shown to have been abused.

Ordinarily, if a plea in abatement can be promptly cured by an amendment, as by adding a necessary party, the suit should not be dismissed without allowing the plaintiff a reasonable time to cure the defect. Luloc OH Co. v. Caldwell County, 601 S.W.2d 789…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Insurance Ass'n of Philadelphia v. DriggersTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Humphrey v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Haney v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. BaezaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Piper v. Estate of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API