Legal Opinion
Pincourt v. Palmer, District Supervisor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 23, 1951No. 10306_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The petitioners, Arthur K. Pincourt and Dorothy Pincourt, trading as Royal Liquors Company, a partnership, filed an application with the defendant, the District Supervisor of the Fourth Supervisory District, Alcohol Tax Unit, for basic permits to rectify and sell distilled spirits at wholesale. Under the provisions of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 49 Stat. 977 et seq., 27 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq., basic permits are required before rectification of distilled spirits or purchase of distilled spirits for resale at wholesale is permitted.
After consideration the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Levers v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. PincourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Levers v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Atlanta Beer Distributing Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. PincourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- L. E. White, M. Donahue and William L. Talbot, Administrator of Thomas F. Talbot Estate, a Partnership, T/a Humes Distributing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Richard A. Demonbreun v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011