Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hellar v. Cenarrusa

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1984No. 15201Published

1Concurrence

*593BISTLINE, Justice,

specially concurring,

The 1984 legislature was drawing to a close without there having been enacted into law a reapportionment plan for this Court’s review under Hellar / — where-under, having affirmed the district court’s declaration of the unconstitutionality of House bill 830, we would determine the constitutionality of any reapportionment plan which became law. Various and diverse motions and petitions were being presented to us. Accordingly, the Court, on March 26. 1984, sent out this notice:

“The Court has ORDERED that an informal conference of attorneys shall be held on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chandler Supply Co., Inc. v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Idaho State Tax Commission v. StakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API