Legal Opinion

Drake v. Seck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1924No. 25,442PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Johnson district court; Jabez 0. Rankin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of thé court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one against the administratrix of the estate of Berthold J. Seck, to recover on two promissory notes executed by Seck in his lifetime. The court directed a verdict, for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Execution of the notes was formally denied under oath. Drake testified his wife wrote the notes. The testimony was admissible because it involved nothing which Drake did or which Seck did in any transaction between them. However, Mrs. Drake testified she wrote the notes. The fact was not disputed, so Drake’s testimony was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuller v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Darnell v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. WoolardIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Keach v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Carver v. MainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Niebauer v. BivinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Furst v. DeWittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API