Legal Opinion

Bovit v. Mantel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 17, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is to foreclose an overdue $4,000 mortgage made to the complainant by one Bolen. Bolen conveyed to the defendants. It is stipulated in the conveyance that it was made subject to the mortgage, the payment of which the defendants assumed. The answer, paragraphs 1 to 12, admits the execution of the mortgage, but denies the debt. The motion is to strike out the paragraph as sham. The complainant's affidavit, in support of the motion, verifies the mortgage and the conveyance to the defendants and avers the payment of an installment of interest, and that "on November 12th, 1930, the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berk v. Isquith Productions, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. Kobrin v. HullNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Demopolis v. GalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. Fry v. LaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API