Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Dodd

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1935No. 6371PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Defendant in error, E. J. Dodd, sued plaintiff in error, Magnolia Petroleum Company, to recover damages for injury to his pick-up oil station located in Seals creek. Seals creek is under our law a natural watercourse. The pick-up station was located on a 27 acre tract of land leased by defendant in error from Harry Hardeman, which tract apparently lay on both sides of the creek. The station was located in the main channel of Seals creek at or near the junction with the east prong of said creek. This station…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Richter v. Granite Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stoner v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Bank of Hopkinsville v. Western Kentucky Asylum for the InsaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Adjudication of the Water Rights, Etc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cassidy v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. In Re the Adjudication of the Upper Guadalupe River Segment of the Guadalupe River BasinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Ben Martinez v. Maverick County Water Control And Improvement District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Linkenhoger v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API