Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 26, 2013No. 103,774PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Christopher Brooks was convicted of rape and aggravated criminal sodomy as the result of a juiy trial in which the victim testified that Brooks had a scar on his penis. Brooks sought *946a new trial, based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel in failing to seek a continuance to obtain evidence to rebut the existence of such a scar. Brooks requested our review of that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion finding that the deficient performance of Brook’s trial counsel was not reversibly prejudicial under the second prong of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Chamberlain v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. CoonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API